Showing posts with label Rejection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rejection. Show all posts

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Getting Discouraged (Part 1 of 4) - Nancy Doyle

Nancy Doyle has written an extensive essay about a topic
with which all artists must cope at one time or another in
their careers. It will be posted over the next few days in four
consecutive parts: Today's segment is on "Rejection". The
remaining segments include: "Criticism" (including Dealing
with Criticism), "Being Discouraged about our Work",
and "The Solution". - Gwen Magee

Most, if not all, artists have times when they are discouraged about their work, or about how their work is received. Certainly if we look at artists from the past, many of the best ones struggled financially, emotionally, professionally, or all of the above. As sports players have slumps, artists go through periods that are fallow or difficult, when nothing seems to work, or we can't find the key, or we feel like we are laboring in obscurity. Society doesn't always embrace artists, who are left basically to fend for themselves, or art is perceived as a commodity, and there is talk about the "art market," the astronomically high prices for art of the past, etc., leaving the impression that the value of a work of art lies only in its investment potential.

It is a cliche that artists starve in garrets, and when they die their work may be sold for many millions of dollars. Van Gogh is a prime example of this; everyone knows how he labored in obscurity and finally in despair. Perhaps this is part of the charm of his mystique, and why people still line up to see his work; his vulnerability, like that of Marilyn Monroe, tugs at our heartstrings. Vincent may have committed suicide because his brother Theo, now married with a child, would no longer be able to support him. After Vincent's death, there was more interest in his work, and in fact the Paris art world would soon embrace work like Vincent's, for example that of Gauguin, Seurat, and Cezanne. So the thing is - maybe if Vincent had just hung in there a little longer, he may have finally found the success he craved, or at least the respect of his peers.
There are many artists who did not receive recognition or success in their lifetimes, or if they did finally arrive, it was shortly before their death, like Cezanne. Cezanne was able to rely on the estate left by his father, so he was relieved of the need to support himself with his work. Luckily for us, he didn't have to work in a bank; he was able to fully commit himself to his work, which was not comprehended by the average person.

There is the idea that art is not a "legitimate" type of work; that it is a frivolity best saved for spare time, etc., or a luxury for the wealthy. But for artists who have a vision that they are compelled to share, art isn't frivolity or luxury - it's a necessity. And for society, art is also a necessity, although this may not be realized by many. We are the spirit-keepers, the mirrors, the candles. And we need to become our own best friends - to believe in ourselves and what we do. And stick together, rather than compete with one another.

So, it can be tough to be an artist; but the job satisfaction is very high. Art uses the whole person - the soul, heart, body and mind. It is a healing activity that brings the joy of producing something meaningful, for the world. It is a magical process, even though it is hard to learn and sometimes difficult to do. I think the origins of art are very old; they say now that art-making may have started hundreds of thousands of years ago, even before homo sapiens evolved. There are gorillas and one elephant who paint, who supposedly love the activity. Maybe some think that this means the activity of art takes no intellectual ability; I take it to mean that art-making is a pre-literate activity coming from our deepest past, that all sentient creatures are capable of accessing their inner selves to produce art. The two gorillas who paint can also speak sign language, and both have described their paintings to humans. Their images are based on specific subjects, and painted with appropriate colors and style to depict that subject. The paintings resemble Abstract Expressionism, with bold colors and gestural strokes.

We paint and sculpt our dreams, our nightmares, our loved ones, our future, our past, beauty, heroism, sorrow, and much more - anything that can be imagined and imaged. As a Beethoven symphony is without words and still expresses a great deal, even to those who know little about music, so art is part of us all. Those of us who make art have a special honor, and an obligation to ourselves and others, to be true to ourselves and to share our vision.

This isn't always easy, and sometimes we get discouraged. This can be due to:

Rejection:

Artists can get rejected when they enter shows, submit their work to galleries or other venues, or unsuccessfully put their work up for sale.

When we are rejected from a juried exhibition, as we all will be, it is a real disappointment. We have created our best work, we have framed it, and we have paid a fee to enter the show. I can only speak about art in the United States, but here there are now a great number of good artists, many of whom have had formal training. The number of eligible artists applying for almost any show is usually very high; transversely, the number of exhibition opportunities is relatively small. A local art center, organization or gallery will hold a juried show, having the capacity to hang maybe 40 or 50 pieces, or less. Two thousand artists will apply; obviously most will be rejected, not necessarily because their work is under par. A juror has to make tough decisions; he or she brings their training, experience and taste to the jurying process. They may have a preference for Minimalist art, or figurative work; they may have little or no art training. (Sometimes a local person is hired, perhaps a knowledgeable architect or craftsperson, who chooses work based on their experience, or lack of it.) Sometimes a juror will select work that collectively combines to create a consistent theme, aesthetically, for instance non-objective work. (Juried shows, where each piece is created by a different artist, can often be a hodge-podge when hung; this is a "necessary evil," but a juror may prefer to hang pieces similar in style, framing, or even size or medium used. One way to deal with this situation is to enter shows selectively, choosing those where your work has a greater chance to be accepted. This can be done by joining art organizations which reflect your aesthetic viewpoint; some art centers may specialize in representational art, other organizations may focus in new, experimental work. By visiting these centers and shows, you may be able to see a certain style preference, or level of sophistication. The identity of the juror also may indicate what he or she will choose; a juror's preferences may be predicted beforehand. Sometimes the entry form for the exhibition will include a juror's background; if the juror is from New York City, this may indicate a preference for new art, whereas a local art teacher may indicate a more traditional approach.

If you are rejected by the juror(s), and visit the show after it has been hung, the work there may explain to you why you were rejected. If you are a painter of flowers, and the juror has selected Minimalist paintings and sculptures, you will have your answer (or vice versa). I have gone to a show a couple of times, and found work that I considered more traditional than mine, or less competent. For the latter, we just need to be philosophical - these things just happen in life sometimes. Sometimes, there is no explanation as to why our work is not chosen; it could be anything - the juror had a headache that day, she doesn't like the color red, he doesn't care for abstraction, etc. Just as we can be rejected in life, our work can be rejected. Try not to take it personally, or be offended; try to be philosophical about it, and try to focus on the shows you have a better chance of getting into. This may take some work and some time, but hang in there - there is a place for almost any type of art, you just need to find it. You might have better luck joining the local art center; they often have both juried and non-juried shows; the non-juried, usually called members' shows, hang every work submitted. (Usually a member can submit up to two pieces.)

Many organizations also hold annual shows, often for fundraising purposes, such as colleges, nonprofit groups, and charity groups. Look for advertisements of these in your local newspapers, or check the bulletin boards at art centers and organizations for "call for entries." If you hear about a show, call the organization and ask how to submit your work for review for inclusion. When a show's purpose is fundraising, they may not care as much about the quality of your work, as about how well it will sell. (They are all about raising money; a local fundraising group stated upfront that they didn't care how good your work was, they only cared whether or not it would sell.) Usually, a group will want to see slides of your work, or the originals, to see if your work will help them raise money, or appeal to their potential buyers. In this case, show them your most "saleable" work; from my experience, this could be florals, beaches, landscapes, or other appealing subject matter. But you can also bring a couple of things that are your specialty, perhaps unique to your work. Try to show them your best work.

There are also local art festivals, especially outdoors in the spring and summer; again, keep an eye on your local paper to catch these. These are usually not juried. Usually you can rent a space or stall for one or two days, where you sit all day and try to sell your work. These are fun, but can also be disappointing if your work is not all that commercial. Usually, smaller paintings and prints sell better here. I can remember sitting at a festival all day, and no one even stopped to look at my work; at the end of the day, the guy next to me who painted images on velvet had a big wad of cash to show for his day. (These experiences humble us; that may not always be a bad thing. It makes us really appreciate the highs when they come.)

If your work has been accepted and hung, is for sale and not bought, this can also bring a feeling of letdown. Again, try to aim for the best venue for your work - where it fits in best. And don't let it get you down for long!

To be shown in a gallery, we also usually have to show our slides, or our original work. You can also shop for a gallery; visit all the galleries in your area, hopefully more than once, to get an idea of where your work would fit in best. Then call the gallery you choose, to ask them what their slide review process is; if possible, make an appointment to show them your work. Some galleries request that you mail slides to them for review; this may take awhile to hear back from them. Make sure your slides are professionally done, either with a good camera yourself, or have a professional photographer take the slides. Usually a slow-speed film is good for this purpose; I think 64 ASA is the slowest color film now. It comes in indoor and outdoor; make sure you choose the right film for taking indoor or outdoor pictures. Number and label the slides, with your name, title of work, medium and date; try to include work done mainly in the last three years. Make a list of your slides, corresponding to your labeled slides, with the same information. If you are showing sculptures, you can include more than one view of each piece. A resume may also be requested; make sure you have a resume typed in a professional manner. A resume can include your education and specialized art training, your teaching or professional experience, relevant groups of which you are a member, and a list of exhibitions in chronological order, listing name of the organization or exhibition, location and year held.

Galleries tend to accept your work on commission, meaning they will hang it, and if it sells, you will receive payment. Galleries take a sales commission, usually between 35% and 90% - the average is about 50%, so set your prices accordingly. Some galleries have rotating exhibitions, usually on an invitational basis. A gallery can decide not to show your work; again, this may be due to a stylistic preference on the part of the gallery. Many galleries also are more concerned with profit margin than with quality; they may reject your work because they feel their clientele would not be interested in buying it. Don't assume that the gallery personnel are knowledgeable in art; they may be, they may not be. Don't take it personally if they decline to show your work; like a blind date, it may just not be meant to be! Try another gallery - don't give up! (Don't EVER give up, if you really believe in what you are doing.)

In summary, the best of us have been rejected: Cezanne, Monet, Manet, Van Gogh, de Kooning, and on and on! Don't let it get to you - it's OK if it slows you down for a little while, but don't let it stop you, if you really, really want to be making art. See The Solution, below. [NOTE: "The Solution" will be available in Part IV]

To read this article in its entirety without having to wait
for me to post the other 3 segments:
.
To learn more about Nancy Doyle and to view her art:

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Quotable Quote - Earl G. Graves

"We keep going back, stronger, not weaker, because we will not allow rejection to beat us down. It will only strengthen our resolve. To be successful there is no other way."
Earl G. Graves

"Putting Rejection in Perspective" - Barbara Macey

If you’re feeling defeated because quilt has been rejected from an exhibition I hope that these true stories will help you to feel more positive and less isolated.

Rejection can be a very touchy subject. It's always unsettling to be rejected but it's an inevitable part of being an art quiltmaker, something that everyone must come to terms with. I asked a number of well known Australian art quiltmakers about their negative experiences. All readily agreed to be mentioned by name in the original newsletter article. They could see that it was in a good cause, that it could help other people to understand that having their quilts rejected is not the end of the world. But most were not keen to have their names included in the website version of the article. For that reason I've given all but one of them nicknames. But I can assure you that every one of these well known art quilters has received many, many rejection letters.

WHAT SPELLS SUCCESS FOR AN ART QUILTER?
.
If it's all so traumatic, why would anyone subject themselves to entering exhibitions with a selection process? No doubt the reasons are varied and complex. Far from being overwhelmed at the thought of having their work critically scrutinised, many people have a competitive spirit and relish the challenge. For some people, this kind of success represents another step forward in their quilting career, another proud entry in their CV. This is important for the quilter who wishes to exhibit in prestigious textile and craft exhibitions. (Exhibitions with no selection process are not generally considered to advance an art quilter's career, nor in certain circumstances should they appear on a CV).

Being selected for the right exhibitions can lead directly to awards, more invitations to exhibit, purchase of work for public or private collections, exposure overseas, teaching appointments or indirectly to grants, residencies and more. Being able to demonstrate a good track record as an artist can be crucial. But it is not for everyone; if the whole idea of putting your work and yourself to the test in this way turns you into a nervous wreck, it's not worth doing. There's nothing wrong with enjoying your quiltmaking without being competitive about it.

SUCCESSFUL QUILTERS GET REJECTIONS TOO
.
I know that many people will be surprised to learn that even the most successful quilters receive many rejection letters. I hope this knowledge will encourage less experienced quiltmakers to continue with their quiltmaking when rejected. Mary enters many exhibitions and has far more rejections than acceptances, perhaps three rejections for each acceptance. Her track record includes more than one success at Quilt National USA and selection for many other international and Australian exhibitions.

Vickie has won many awards but was frustrated when her wool quilt was not accepted for two exhibitions. It did not seem to fit either traditional or contemporary categories: she wonders if there is a need for another category.
.
Of course as quilters become more experienced and have a few successes behind them, they tend to enter more challenging quilt exhibitions as well as general textile and mixed craft exhibitions. It is important to remember that the higher one aims the greater the risk of being rejected. The prestigious Quilt National USA 1999 had over 1400 entries with only 89 being selected. It's a great honour to be accepted for an exhibition of this calibre, and certainly no disgrace to be rejected.

IT PAYS TO BE PERSISTENT
.
All successful quilters are persistent, but if there were a prize it would surely go to Glenys Mann of Tamworth, New South Wales. Glenys had twenty seven rejections in a row before taking stock of the situation. She realised that she hadn't been reading the entry forms properly and wasn't giving her entries enough thought. Most importantly she had the courage and insight to appraise her work honestly, saw that she needed to change her tactics and at once found success.

CAN THE SELECTORS BE WRONG?
.
Quilts are sometimes rejected from one exhibition then accepted for another. It could be that they were first entered in an exhibition that wasn't appropriate for them. Perhaps it was due to individual differences between selectors. Or maybe it was a genuine mistake on the part of selectors with insufficient knowledge of art quilts. For whatever reason, it is plain that selectors can and do make mistakes. If you think your quilt has been mistakenly rejected, you must accept the decision as final and refrain from complaining to the exhibition organisers. It will achieve nothing, and could count against you in the future.

Jo says it took her a while to get used to rejection, but it's happened so many times she doesn't worry about it now. However, she was quite upset when a client took one of her quilts home on approval, nailed it to the wall, then decided not to buy it! After being repaired, it was later bought by an American TV executive. Hetty had a quilt acquired for the collection of a Russian museum after it was rejected from an Australian exhibition.

My own first rejection in 1973 had both positive and negative outcomes. I decided to enter my first exhibition not really understanding the implications. Turning up at the opening with a friend I felt extremely humiliated when my little patchwork panel was nowhere to be seen. I learned that the 'rejects' were hung at a different venue. My entry was with the rejects because the selection committee thought that it (not a photo mind you), was a piece of curtain material printed with an Op Art design!

Fortunately someone later noticed that it was in fact a novel piece of patchwork and I was immediately invited to conduct workshops and to hold a solo exhibition which was very successful. The same people who had rejected my work were later instrumental in encouraging me to enter craft exhibitions that opened new doors.

A short time later I entered an 'avant garde' quilt in a local textiles exhibition that was supposedly 'cutting edge'. It was rejected, though a rather traditional quilt was accepted. In this case I was able to be more philosophical, concluding – correctly as later events proved - that my quilt was before its time! These were the first in a long list of rejections I've had over the years. Fortunately there have been many acceptances too.
.
I think that I was upset at the first rejection because it was so public and because there was no prior notification. Since then I have helped to organise many exhibitions and this experience has made me very much aware of the need to keep the whole process confidential and to promptly inform all entrants of their success or otherwise.

DO WE EVER DESERVE REJECTION?
.
For a number of very successful people I spoke with, the answer was ‘yes’. They believed that in some instances they had not succeeded in making a first class quilt and were occasionally relieved that their work was rejected. Some thought that fast approaching deadlines had distracted them. Others believed that experimental work had not really succeeded. Experimentation and innovation are mainstays of art quiltmaking but since all experimentation is a risk it is crucial to be able to honestly assess the success of your own efforts. Just being original certainly isn't enough.

If you can foster the ability to stand back and be detached about your quilt you are less likely to make bad decisions about how successful it is. It also helps to begin well before the deadline to give yourself time to start again if necessary. It takes practice and a resolve to avoid self deception. It's not easy because flaws in the design of a quilt are not always self evident in the same way as they are in something purely practical like a jug that doesn't pour properly!

CAN REJECTION BE POSITIVE?
.
I'm really embarrassed about a few of my own quilts that have been selected and in my opinion shouldn't have been. To make matters worse, photos of some of them have been included in exhibition catalogues. Looking at them now, I think that they are not really bad quilts, but they're not good either! Only good quilts enhance your reputation. In the long run the selectors are doing you a favour by rejecting your less successful quilts, though you may not realise this until later!

WHEN ACCEPTANCE IS REJECTION!
.
Some people experience a kind of rejection whilst apparently being accepted. Trudie entered a quilt in an exhibition. It was well known that though there was no formal selection, the least favoured items were hung as far as possible from the entrance door of the exhibition space. Trudie was mortified to find that her quilt was hung a great distance from the door, and even worse, it was hung out of sight on the back of a cabinet! This was a case of the wrong kind of exhibition for a wonderfully adventurous quilt.

Agatha had just returned from a trip to Japan when I spoke with her. She was disappointed that though her quilt had been accepted for exhibition, it was returned without being hung, along with the quilts of several other Australians who had also been told that they had been accepted.

Edna had two quilts selected for a national mixed craft exhibition in a distant city. By chance she discovered that they were not hung and though she made inquiries, no explanation was ever given. The makers of other quilts selected for the same exhibition – also not hung - were told that there was not enough space available. Incidents like this should never happen.

IMPROVE YOUR CHANCES OF ACCEPTANCE NEXT TIME
  • Stay positive and confident. Realise that receiving
    rejections is the norm for everyone. Don't let it stop
    you from entering another exhibition. Like Glenys Mann,
    you can resolve to make it a learning experience by
    honestly assessing what went wrong.
    .
  • Take the initiative, work at resolving problem areas.
    .
  • Is there a possibility that you're entering the wrong kind of exhibition?
    .
  • Are you hazy about what's original and what's not?
    .
  • Does your design or technique need improving?
    .
  • It's important to develop a coherent body of work,
    to make your own exciting journey as a quiltmaker.
    Are you doing this or just responding to exhibition
    opportunities as they come up?
Educate yourself - it can be fun!
  • Is your photography letting you down? Try
    taking a course or refer to one of the many
    excellent books now available.
    .
  • Consider a mentor. You could approach an
    established quilt artist with a view to arranging
    a kind of apprenticeship in exchange for acting
    as her assistant part time for a while. (If you will
    be working in someone else's studio, find out first
    how you stand legally. For example, will you be
    covered by insurance in case of injury or other
    adverse circumstances?)
    .
  • If there are other art quilters in your area, maybe
    you could get together and form a group for mutual
    support. Many people have done this successfully.
    .
  • Is there a critique group nearby? If so, give it a try,
    if not consider forming one yourself. The benefits
    are truly worthwhile and having your work assessed
    by an expert in front of a group isn't nearly as scary
    as you'd imagine.
    .
  • Broaden your view and hone your skills by taking
    master classes with appropriate tutors.
    .
  • Consider taking a tertiary arts/textiles course.
    Some institutions now make it possible to study no
    matter where you live.
    .
  • Read widely and attend art quilt exhibitions as well
    as other high profile art and craft exhibitions. Absorb
    information from websites, magazines, books and
    exhibition catalogues local and international. Don't
    forget historical quilts, there is much to be learned
    from them.
    .
  • Do all this and you will begin to get a feel for what's
    going on in the contemporary art world and where
    you and your work fit in.

Be well organised
.
This all sounds obvious but it's surprising how many people fall by the wayside because they neglect the basics.

  • Read the entry form before starting to make
    your quilt, note the rules and stick to them.
    .
  • Answer every question and keep your statement
    to the prescribed length.
    .
  • Work out a timetable that allows plenty of time
    for designing and making the quilt plus plenty of
    time for photography and any necessary processing.
    Then allow extra time in case something goes wrong!
    .
  • Learn to take good photos or find a professional
    photographer, preferably one who has a good reputation
    for photographing quilts.
    .
  • Avoid being disqualified due to your entry arriving
    too late. Make sure you send it off in time to reach
    the organiser well before the deadline.
    .
  • Don’t ever ask for any favours or expect the exhibition
    organiser to change the rules for you. That would be
    unethical because it’s not fair to those who have taken
    the trouble to abide by them.
    .
  • Take the initiative, be honest with yourself, and learn
    to be your own most ruthless critic. In the end, only
    you are responsible for what you achieve.

SELECTORS AND JUDGES
.
Though disgruntled rejectees often suspect some kind of favouritism or unfairness, I believe that this is quite exceptional. After all, selectors value their reputations too, and most take pride in doing a good job.

Certainly the ones I spoke with approach their task very seriously. Selectors are aware that it is unfair and inappropriate to bring biased views to the selection process and they make an immense effort to be even handed. In a small place like Australia, it's inevitable that selectors will know some of the quiltmakers whose work they are assessing. It's unavoidable but need not be a major problem. Selectors are conscious that the situation calls for great care and speak of bending over backwards to avoid favouring someone whose work they recognise. But often it’s not recognised; I've been surprised on more than one occasion to learn that I've rejected the work of well known and successful quiltmakers who are personal friends, a painful experience for all, but you can't get more unbiased than that! My own work has also occasionally been rejected by a friend.

Most organisers attempt to minimise the risk of bias by employing a panel of selectors of varied background, usually three in number to avoid a stalemate. Those who are not quiltmakers usually have appropriate specialised knowledge of some aspect of the art world, though they may not know much about quilts. To provide a balance and remedy this deficiency it is usual to include a quiltmaker. If the exhibition is held regularly, there will be a different panel each time. Thus entrants who are rejected by one panel may well be accepted by another. There are variations on this arrangement. Some institutions have a single selector, different on each occasion. Others, perhaps with a particular policy in mind, use their own staff on all occasions.

In fact, we all have biases that we are not aware of. It would be naive to imagine that bias can be totally eliminated, but it can certainly be reduced. In the end, selectors are only human and exhibition entrants need to be realistic about what can be expected of them. The vast majority do approach their difficult task with the utmost care.

Sometimes the identity of selectors is publicised beforehand, sometimes it is not. There are people who decide whether or not to enter an exhibition on the basis of who is on the selection panel. I don't know how effective this strategy is, but I suspect that it's doesn't always enhance the entrant's chances of success.

I hope that these true stories of rejection will help you to feel less isolated and encourage you to keep making quilts, and to keep entering exhibitions. It's quite evident that receiving a rejection letter doesn't mean that a quiltmaker is a failure. Rather, it's a reminder that persistence counts as much as ability and that is very encouraging.

Barbara Macey © 2001

This article is part of a series giving a behind-the-scenes account of exhibitions from the point of view of the exhibitor and of the organiser.

It was first published in Ozquilt Network Newsletter (#40, June 2001), the newsletter of Ozquilt Network Inc, Australia’s organisation for art quilters. The article also appears in the newsletter archive on their website, http://www.ozquiltnetwork.org.au/
Email: admin@ozquiltnetwork.org.au

Barbara Macey is the Ozquilt Network, Inc. Newsletter Editor,
Website Coordinator and Running Stitch Coordinator

Sunday, July 8, 2007

Rejection Letter Humor

The following has been circulating around the web as being “The Ultimate Rejection Letter”. It is, in fact, the rejection of a rejection letter. Written by a grad student in 1995 to express his feelings about being rejected for a teaching position, copies were given just to a few of his close friends. He never mailed it and had no idea it had been circulated on the internet until he stumbled across it in 2002. None of the names in the letter are real, nor is the school. You can read his story on the following site:
http://www.ufobreakfast.com/archive/00000194.htm

Herbert A. Millington
Chair - Search Committee
412A Clarkson Hall, Whitson University
College Hill, MA 34109

Dear Professor Millington:

Thank you for your letter of March 16. After careful consideration, I regret to inform you that I am unable to accept your refusal to offer me an assistant professor position in your department.

This year I have been particularly fortunate in receiving an unusually large number of rejection letters. With such a varied and promising field of candidates, it is impossible for me to accept all refusals.

Despite Whitson’s outstanding qualifications and previous experience in rejecting applicants, I find that your rejection does not meet my needs at this time. Therefore, I will assume the position of assistant professor in your department this August. I look forward to seeing you then.

Best of luck in rejecting future applicants.

Sincerely,

Chris L. Jensen

_______________

Rejection Letter Toilet Paper – If you have enough disposable income, you can really make a statement regarding your feelings about receiving a rejection letter.
http://www.lulu.com/tp

Express Your Feelings – Have “Bart” say it for you – type in a phrase, then click the “Crear nueva frase” button
http://www.milinkito.com/swf/bart.php?texto=&,Submit=Crear+nueva+frase

Feeling Rejected? – Robbie Eklow asks, “What if quilt shows offered you the chance to write your own acceptance/rejection letter?"
http://www.robbieklow.com/journal-details.asp?ID=2

Monday, July 2, 2007

"On Burning Bridges" - Matthew Deleget

Matthew Deleget writes the "Ask Dr. Art" columns for the NYFA Quarterly - a newsletter of the New York Foundation for the Arts (NYFA) - http://www.nyfa.org. The following article was published in the Fall 2001 issue. It is reprinted here by permission:

(In this column I discuss a letter of rejection NYFA received back from an applicant to the Artists’ Fellowship Program. The applicant wrote "FUCK YOU" in large letters with a black marker across the rejection letter.)

When I first saw this letter, I was speechless. It is an arresting visual/verbal expression of utter frustration and thorough disappointment, and I am sure that the artist who wrote it is not the only one feeling this way. (This year, NYFA’s Artists’ Fellowship program received 3,376 applications in eight discipline categories, and awarded 158 grants, which means 3,218 artists did not receive a grant this year.) At one level, I found the letter irritating, but I also wondered to myself what would make an artist reach this point of combustion. In my imagination, I tried to retrace the steps this artist took in articulating such an angry response: receiving and opening the envelope with great anticipation; reading the letter; growing consumed with anger; grabbing a large black marker; writing commentary directly on the letter; stuffing it back in an envelope; and mailing it off.

On the one hand, I completely understand this artist’s sentiment. As a working artist myself, I have received dozens of rejection letters after applying to similar programs. I can honestly say from first-hand experience that there is definitely no worse feeling than receiving an SASE back in the mail and being able to feel my slides through the envelope. Who wouldn’t be upset by this? I have also felt myself reach the point where I could barely control my impulse to shred the rejection letter to pieces, or, even worse, to fire off a revengeful letter of my own back to the organization rejecting their rejection of me. However, thinking about something and actually doing it are two entirely different matters.

I feel that this artist clearly crossed a line into unprofessionalism. Being "creative" doesn’t justify acting unprofessionally. Letters like this one can and will burn bridges; they can even jeopardize a career trajectory. This letter, driven in part by a feeling of self-entitlement, is, in many ways, a classic case of biting the hand that feeds you. More importantly, its comments are not only directed at NYFA, but at the arts community as a whole: individual artists, arts professionals (arts administrators, curators, gallerists, and critics) and arts organizations (non-profits, private foundations, government arts agencies, and corporate sponsors). Supporting an individual artist takes an entire arts community, and running support programs always requires the participation of individuals working in each of these areas. To be sure, most arts organizations out there are not pleading with artists for assistance, but the opposite is almost always true. Thus, when an artist responds by saying "FUCK YOU" to a program—any program set up to assist individual artists—its repercussions can be severe and more widespread than initially realized. It’s important to remember that the art world is hardly a "world" at all; rather, it consists of a relatively small community of individuals. And these individuals are in constant communication with each other. It has been known to happen that problematic artists—meaning artists who are consistently difficult to work with—can and do get blacklisted. I have seen this occur to several artists I know, some of whom have even lost their gallery representation as a result. The message is clear: no one wants to work with an artist who is a constant hassle.

Now, on to some solutions. After speaking with literally thousands of artists from around the country who have called the Visual Artist Information Hotline, I have begun to see a very particular behavioral pattern surface among them. I have noticed that artists tend to place all their efforts into a single application (think eggs in a basket). It’s no wonder, then, that a rejection letter can set an artist into a tailspin. A single rejection should never be so upsetting that it causes an artist to lash out against her or his colleagues and the support mechanisms around her or him. Successful artists—I mean here those artists who are able to maintain a healthy career and state of mind—have no doubt developed a thick skin due to years of rejection. I’ve also noticed one thing that they all share in common. Successful artists are continually juggling many balls in the air at once. They are constantly sending out a steady stream of applications and proposals from their studios, applying and reapplying to each and every program every year they are eligible. It goes without saying that the more balls an artist has in the air, the less significant one ball becomes when it falls to the floor. Artists who consciously choose to juggle only one ball at a time are sentencing themselves to a lifetime of frustration and, most likely, failure.

Being an artist in the year 2001 requires much more than just making great work in an isolated studio. It also means branching out and applying to support programs and other opportunities, networking and sharing ideas with peers, and maintaining a professional approach. If not, to quote Jackie Battenfield of the Artist in the Marketplace Program at the Bronx Museum of the Arts, "You are not doing your job as an artist." Personally, I have discovered that the best way to exorcise the rejection demons is simple. Every time I receive my materials back in the mail accompanied by a rejection letter, I send them back out again to a new program or venue. Similarly, I recommend you have your materials in constant circulation. Slides sitting on a shelf in the studio are literally not going anywhere. Being an artist is a choice for life, so over the course of a lifetime, an artist is undoubtedly going to receive a lot of rejections. Remember to stay positive, be professional, and keep applying.

(The New York Foundation for the Arts' (NYFA) mission is to empower artists at critical stages in their creative lives and provides the public with opportunities to experience and understand their work. NYFA accomplishes this by offering financial assistance and information to artists and organizations that directly serve artists, by supporting arts programming in the community, and by building collaborative relationships with others who advocate for the arts in New York State and throughout the country [italics added] - http://www.nyfa.org )

Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Rejection

The subject of the last post was Critique. Today's topic deals with how we as artists can effectively cope with the ultimate in negative critique - rejection. Following are links to three articles about dealing with rejection as well as the text of an article on rejection that was originally published in the November 2006 issue of Creative Wisdom, "...a timely, topical, monthly newsletter on sculpture written by the editors of and contributors to Sculptural Pursuit magazine." http://www.sculpturalpursuit.com/goto/ezine
It is reprinted here by permission.

Rejection: Playing The Game - Marilyn Noble
http://www.sculpturalpursuit.com/media/EDocs/Creative_Wisdom__Handling_Rejection_and_Copyrights.htm#article14

Sometimes the universe tests us with rejection; life asks us if we are confident enough in ourselves and our creations to keep going in the face of obstacles. . . .While we must be open to feedback, we must also hold a faith that supersedes the opinions of those who do not agree with us. If you believe in something enough, you will not be put off by obstacles or setbacks. - Alan Cohen

The invitation arrives in the mail and your heart skips a beat. You’ve been asked to submit a piece for jury consideration for the biggest museum show in your area. You’ve just finished a work that you know is perfect. It’s a shoe-in. You fill out the application, enclose the slides, and send them off, confident you’ll be accepted. You envision your piece in glossy splendor on the pages of the show catalog; you imagine yourself stepping forward to receive the Best in Show award. Fame and glory follow. Your career is made.

Several weeks later the letter comes in the mail. “Dear Artist,” it begins. “We regret to inform you. . .” You’re crushed. You berate yourself. I’m so stupid, How did I think I could possibly get into a show like that? Then you get angry. The jurors are idiots. They obviously don’t understand good work. You vow to get even. I’ll show them. I’ll never create another piece of sculpture again. And I’ll never set foot in that museum again either. You rationalize. I’m sure they had to play the political game and accept work from the director's third cousin and their big donors. They didn’t have room for me.

Once the initial emotions have finished racing through your heart and head, what’s your next step? Do you dash off an angry letter to the director of the museum, thus ensuring you’ll never be invited to show there? Do you moan and complain to everyone you know, convincing your family, friends and colleagues that you’re a spoiled diva? Do you give up, believing your work will never be good enough? If you stay stuck in those unproductive emotions, you’ll never achieve the level of success you desire, a level many of your less talented colleagues may surpass.

Professional artists know rejection is part of the game -- it happens to everybody. The difference between satisfying success and bitter failure is how you handle it. Rejection always hurts, but accepting the pain and moving on is critical to building your career. How do you do that?
  1. Turn loose of your work. As with a child that you bring into the world and raise, at some point you have to let go. Your children move into other relationships in life, and so must your art. You can still love the pieces you create, but allow others to love them, or not, as well.

  2. Realize your work is not You. Your work may be the deepest expression of your soul, but it’s not your soul. Rejection has little to do with you, and everything to do with the viewer. Jurors and others who examine your work do so through their own lenses of life experience. Sometimes they relate, sometimes they don’t. It doesn’t mean they don’t like, admire, respect, or even know You.

  3. Rejection is not necessarily criticism. Galleries, jurors, and others who make choices about work make those decisions based on criteria about which you may not know. They may reject your work not because it’s poor quality, but because they have enough bronze figures, or abstract stone, or wood miniatures. Maybe it’s simply not a fit for the gallery or show. Much of the time it has nothing to do with your talent, your statement, or your creative expression.

  4. With criticism, accept what makes sense to you and ignore the rest. Everybody has an opinion, and most people don’t hesitate to express theirs. Consider the source of the criticism. If an art professional tells you your piece lacks proportion and gives you some ideas about fixing it, pay closer attention than you would to a collector who lives in a house full of ceramic frogs who tells you your abstract female figure doesn’t have any personality. It’s important to listen with an open mind, and then take an objective look at your work. If you can see how it would improve by incorporating someone’s suggestions, do it. If not, let the comments go.

  5. As my best friend says, honor the process. Continue to improve your skills, stay true to your vision, create your art, and send it out into the world. Let go of your attachment to the results. Sometimes you’ll feel the sting of rejection; other times you’ll feel the happiness of success. It’s all part of the journey. As in life, the journey is just as important as the destination.

  6. When all else fails, comfort yourself with the thought that every no leads one step closer to yes. You’ll learn to relish the rejection because you know acceptance is imminent. A writing friend of mine plays something he calls the Rejection Game. His aim is to collect one hundred rejection slips all while writing the best he can. He’s never reached the goal because he gets so many acceptances along with the rejections that he doesn’t have time to keep playing the game.

______________________

Dealing With Rejection – by Matthew Deleget and Sandra Indig
http://www.sindig.com/A-6.htm

Rejection Article - David Walker
http://www.davidwalker.us/Pages/QRejectionArticle.html

Understanding Rejection - Sylvia White
http://www.artadvice.com/advice/article18.php